MATH40002 · Practice Paper

MATH40002 2026 Exam Standard Full Paper B

Revision questions and worked solutions, presented read-only. This review interface was prepared after the recorded study period.

Status
Completed
Questions completed
4 / 4
Suggested time
120 minutes
Source date
2026-08-01
← Back to course 4 question-and-solution records
Question 120 marks

Question 1 · Sequences, series and the boundary

For \(n\ge1\), define \[ a_n=\sqrt{n+4}-\sqrt{n+1}. \] (a) Show that \(a_n\to0\), and prove from the \(\varepsilon\)-\(N\) definition that \(\sqrt n\,a_n\to3/2\). **(5 marks)** (b) Determine whether \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n\) converges. Your justification must use partial sums rather than only the term test. **(3 marks)** (c) Prove that \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{n-1}a_n\) converges and obtain an explicit condition on \(N\) that guarantees the truncation error is below \(10^{-3}\). **(5 marks)** (d) Let \(F(z)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_nz^n\). Find its radius of convergence, then investigate separately \(z=1\), \(z=-1\), and \(z=e^{i\theta}\) for \(0<\theta<2\pi\). **(7 marks)** **[Total: 20 marks]**
Worked solution and marking guidance
**(a)** Rationalising gives \[ a_n=\frac{3}{\sqrt{n+4}+\sqrt{n+1}}>0. \] In particular \(0<a_n\le 3/(2\sqrt{n+1})\), so \(a_n\to0\) (for example, \(n>9/(4\varepsilon^2)\) is sufficient). Also \[ \sqrt n\,a_n= \frac{3}{\sqrt{1+4/n}+\sqrt{1+1/n}}. \] Since \(\sqrt{1+t}-1\le t/2\) for \(t\ge0\), \[ 0\le\frac32-\sqrt n\,a_n \le\frac34\left(\sqrt{1+4/n}-1+\sqrt{1+1/n}-1\right) \le\frac{15}{8n}. \] Thus any integer \(N>15/(8\varepsilon)\) proves from the definition that \(|\sqrt n\,a_n-3/2|<\varepsilon\) for all \(n\ge N\). **(b)** The partial sums cancel in three shifted strings: \[ \sum_{n=1}^N a_n =\sqrt{N+2}+\sqrt{N+3}+\sqrt{N+4} -(\sqrt2+\sqrt3+2). \] They tend to \(+\infty\). Hence the positive series diverges. **(c)** The numbers \(a_n\) are positive, decrease because their rationalised denominators increase, and tend to zero. The alternating series therefore converges and \[ |S-S_N|\le a_{N+1} =\frac3{\sqrt{N+5}+\sqrt{N+2}} \le\frac3{2\sqrt{N+2}}. \] Consequently \(N\ge2{,}249{,}999\) is a simple sufficient integer condition for the error to be strictly below \(10^{-3}\). **(d)** Since \(a_n\sim3/(2\sqrt n)\), the root test gives \(R=1\). At \(z=1\) the series is the divergent positive series from (b). At \(z=-1\) it is conditionally convergent by (c). For \(z=e^{i\theta}\), \(0<\theta<2\pi\), the partial sums of \(e^{in\theta}\) are bounded and \(a_n\downarrow0\), so Dirichlet's test gives convergence. It is never absolute on \(|z|=1\), because \(\sum |a_nz^n|=\sum a_n\) diverges.
Question 220 marks

Question 2 · Continuity and compactness

(a) Let \(f:[0,2]\to\mathbb R\) be continuous and suppose \(f(q)=q^2\) for every rational \(q\in[0,2]\). Prove that \(f(x)=x^2\) for every \(x\in[0,2]\). **(5 marks)** (b) Let \(g:(0,2)\to\mathbb R\) be continuous and assume both one-sided endpoint limits exist and are finite. Define an extension \(G:[0,2]\to\mathbb R\), prove it is continuous at both endpoints, and deduce that \(g\) is uniformly continuous. **(7 marks)** (c) Consider \(h(x)=\sin(1/x)\) on \((0,1)\). Show that \(h\) is continuous and bounded, but not uniformly continuous. Your proof of failure must give two explicit sequences whose mutual distance tends to zero while their \(h\)-values remain separated. **(6 marks)** (d) State one additional hypothesis on a general domain that would make a continuous function uniformly continuous, and name the theorem used. **(2 marks)** **[Total: 20 marks]**
Worked solution and marking guidance
**(a)** Fix \(x\in[0,2]\). By density choose rationals \(q_n\in[0,2]\) with \(q_n\to x\). Continuity gives \[ f(x)=\lim f(q_n)=\lim q_n^2=x^2. \] **(b)** Put \[ G(x)= \begin{cases} \lim_{t\to0^+}g(t),&x=0,\\ g(x),&0<x<2,\\ \lim_{t\to2^-}g(t),&x=2. \end{cases} \] The definitions of the one-sided limits prove continuity at 0 and 2; interior continuity is inherited from \(g\). Thus \(G\) is continuous on compact \([0,2]\), so Heine-Cantor makes \(G\) uniformly continuous. Restriction to \((0,2)\) makes \(g\) uniformly continuous. **(c)** Continuity and \(|h|\le1\) are immediate. Let \[ x_n=\frac1{\pi/2+2\pi n},\qquad y_n=\frac1{3\pi/2+2\pi n}. \] Then \(x_n,y_n\to0\) and \(|x_n-y_n|\to0\), but \(h(x_n)=1\) and \(h(y_n)=-1\). Taking, for instance, \(\varepsilon=1\) contradicts the single global \(\delta\) required for uniform continuity. **(d)** A continuous real-valued function on a compact metric domain is uniformly continuous (Heine-Cantor theorem).
Question 320 marks

Question 3 · Darboux integration and theorem hypotheses

(a) For each statement, decide whether it is true or false and give a proof or a counterexample: 1. the composition of two Darboux-integrable functions on \([0,1]\) is always Darboux integrable; 2. the maximum of two convex functions on an interval is convex; 3. if a differentiable bijection and its inverse are both differentiable, then the derivative of the original function never vanishes. **(9 marks)** (b) State precisely the definition of Darboux integrability, including lower and upper sums and the quantifiers in the epsilon criterion. **(4 marks)** (c) State Taylor's theorem of order \(n\) with the integral remainder, listing the regularity assumptions. **(4 marks)** (d) State one valid form of L'Hopital's rule and identify the two indeterminate forms to which that version applies. **(3 marks)** **[Total: 20 marks]**
Worked solution and marking guidance
**(a)(i) False.** Let \(g\) be Thomae's function on \([0,1]\): \(g(x)=0\) at irrationals and \(g(p/q)=1/q\) in lowest terms. It is Darboux integrable. Let \(f(0)=1\) and \(f(y)=0\) for \(y>0\); \(f\) is bounded and has only one discontinuity, so is Darboux integrable. But \(f\circ g\) is 1 at irrationals and 0 at rationals, so every non-degenerate subinterval has oscillation 1 and the composition is not Darboux integrable. **(a)(ii) True.** If \(h=\max(f,g)\), then for \(0\le t\le1\), \[ h(tx+(1-t)y) \le\max\{tf(x)+(1-t)f(y),\,tg(x)+(1-t)g(y)\} \le th(x)+(1-t)h(y). \] **(a)(iii) True.** From \(f^{-1}(f(x))=x\), the chain rule gives \((f^{-1})'(f(x))f'(x)=1\), hence \(f'(x)\ne0\). **(b)** For a partition \(P:a=x_0<\cdots<x_m=b\), let \[ m_i=\inf_{[x_{i-1},x_i]}f,\quad M_i=\sup_{[x_{i-1},x_i]}f, \] \[ L(f,P)=\sum_i m_i\Delta x_i,\qquad U(f,P)=\sum_i M_i\Delta x_i. \] A bounded \(f\) is Darboux integrable iff \(\sup_P L(f,P)=\inf_P U(f,P)\), equivalently iff for every \(\varepsilon>0\) there exists a partition \(P\) such that \(U(f,P)-L(f,P)<\varepsilon\). **(c)** If \(f^{(n)}\) is absolutely continuous on the interval between \(a\) and \(x\) (in particular, \(f^{(n+1)}\) continuous is sufficient), then \[ f(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{f^{(k)}(a)}{k!}(x-a)^k+ \frac1{n!}\int_a^x(x-t)^n f^{(n+1)}(t)\,dt. \] **(d)** One standard local form is: if \(f,g\) are differentiable on a punctured neighbourhood of \(a\), \(g'(x)\ne0\), both \(f(x),g(x)\to0\) or both have unbounded magnitude, and \(\lim f'(x)/g'(x)=L\) exists (finite or infinite), then under the usual interval/end-point hypotheses \(\lim f(x)/g(x)=L\). The forms are \(0/0\) and \(\infty/\infty\).
Question 420 marks

Question 4 · Convexity and behaviour at infinity

Let \(f:[0,\infty)\to\mathbb R\) be continuous, twice differentiable on \((0,\infty)\), bounded, and satisfy \(f''(x)\ge0\) for every \(x>0\). (a) Prove that \(f\) is non-increasing. **(3 marks)** (b) With \(\ell=\inf_{x\ge0}f(x)\), prove directly from the definition of infimum that \(f(x)\to\ell\) as \(x\to\infty\). **(4 marks)** (c) Prove that \(f'(x)\to0\). Your argument must rule out a strictly negative limiting derivative as well as a positive derivative. **(4 marks)** (d) Show that for every \(x>0\), \[ xf'(x)\le f(2x)-f(x)\le xf'(2x), \] and use this with the previous parts to prove \(xf'(x)\to0\). **(6 marks)** (e) Explain which conclusions can fail if boundedness is removed, giving one convex example. **(3 marks)** **[Total: 20 marks]**
Worked solution and marking guidance
**(a)** Convexity makes \(f'\) non-decreasing. If \(f'(x_0)>0\), then for \(y>x_0\), \(f(y)\ge f(x_0)+f'(x_0)(y-x_0)\), contradicting boundedness. Thus \(f'\le0\), so \(f\) is non-increasing. **(b)** Since \(f\) is non-increasing and bounded below, \(f(x)\ge \ell\). Given \(\varepsilon>0\), the definition of infimum supplies \(x_0\) with \(f(x_0)<\ell+\varepsilon\). For \(x\ge x_0\), \[ \ell\le f(x)\le f(x_0)<\ell+\varepsilon. \] Hence \(f(x)\to\ell\). **(c)** The increasing function \(f'\), bounded above by 0, has a limit \(L\le0\). If \(L<0\), then eventually \(f'(x)<L/2<0\); integration would force \(f(x)\to-\infty\), contradicting boundedness. Therefore \(L=0\). **(d)** On \([x,2x]\), monotonicity of \(f'\) gives \[ xf'(x)\le\int_x^{2x}f'(t)\,dt=f(2x)-f(x)\le xf'(2x). \] The middle expression tends to zero by (b). Also \[ f(x)-f(x/2)\le (x/2)f'(x)\le0. \] Its left side tends to zero, so \(2(f(x)-f(x/2))\le xf'(x)\le0\); the squeeze theorem yields \(xf'(x)\to0\). **(e)** Without boundedness take \(f(x)=x\). It is convex but increasing, \(f'(x)=1\not\to0\), and \(xf'(x)=x\not\to0\).