Question 1
MA TH40003 Linear Algebra and Group Theory Tony 2026 Summer Resit
MATH40003 – Linear Algebra and Group Theory
2026 Summer Resit Preparation – Original Equal-Difficulty Mock Paper
Time allowed: 2 hours. Total: 80 marks. Four questions, each worth 20 marks.
This is a closed-book final blind paper. Start each question on a new sheet. Y ou may use results from earlier parts
of a question in later parts without proving them again. Let F be a field unless another field is stated. Give
complete arguments, including exceptional characteristic cases.
Mock Paper 8: Final comprehensive unseen practice paper
Question 1
Let T : F 4 → F 4 be the linear transformation
T (a, b, c, d)t = (a + c, b + d, a + c, b + d)t.
(a) Write down the matrix of T in the standard basis. (2 marks)
(b) Find bases for ker T and im T , and determine the rank and nullity of T . (6 marks)
(c) Prove that T 2 = 2T . Assume that 2 is invertible in F , put P = 1
2 T , and prove
F 4 = im T ⊕ ker T.
Find the matrices of T and P in a basis adapted to this direct sum. (5 marks)
(d) Assume now that 2 = 0 in F . Prove that T 2 = 0 and im T = ker T . Prove that I − T is invertible and give its inverse.
(4 marks)
(e) Determine the eigenvalues of T and decide whether T is diagonalisable in each of the two characteristic cases. (3 marks)
1
Worked solution and marking guidance
MA TH40003 Linear Algebra and Group Theory Tony 2026 Summer Resit
MATH40003 – Complete Solutions and Marking Guide
Mock Paper 8: Final comprehensive unseen practice paper
Each question carries 20 marks. The mark splits are indicative and reward mathematically equivalent arguments.
Question 1 – Solution and marking guide
Put
u1 = (1, 0, 1, 0)t, u 2 = (0, 1, 0, 1)t, k 1 = (1, 0, −1, 0)t, k 2 = (0, 1, 0, −1)t.
(a)
[T ] =
1 0 1 0
0 1 0 1
1 0 1 0
0 1 0 1
.
[2]
(b) The equations for the kernel are a + c = 0 and b + d = 0, hence
ker T = span{k1, k2}.
Every output is (r, s, r, s)t, and both u1, u2 occur as outputs, so
im T = span{u1, u2}.
Thus rk T = 2 and nullity T = 2 . These statements remain valid in characteristic 2; only the relation between the two
subspaces changes. [6]
(c) Applying T twice gives
T 2(a, b, c, d)t = 2(a + c, b + d, a + c, b + d)t = 2T (a, b, c, d)t.
Thus P 2 = P . If 2 is invertible, then u1, u2, k1, k2 form a basis: the first two span im T , the last two span ker T , and their
intersection is zero because (r, s, r, s) ∈ ker T implies 2r = 2s = 0. Therefore
F 4 = im T ⊕ ker T.
In the ordered adapted basis (u1, u2, k1, k2),
[T ] = diag(2, 2, 0, 0), [P ] = diag(1, 1, 0, 0).
[5]
(d) If 2 = 0 , the identity T 2 = 2 T gives T 2 = 0 , so im T ⊆ ker T . Both spaces have dimension 2, hence they are equal;
equivalently ki = ui in characteristic 2. Moreover
(I − T )(I + T ) = I − T 2 = I = (I + T )(I − T ),
so (I − T )−1 = I + T (which equals I − T in characteristic 2). [4]
(e) If 2 ̸= 0 , T acts as multiplication by 2 on im T and as 0 on ker T , so its eigenvalues are 2 and 0, and the direct-sum
eigenbasis shows that it is diagonalisable. If 2 = 0 , T 2 = 0, so the only possible eigenvalue is 0. Since T ̸= 0, it cannot be
diagonalisable: a diagonalisable operator with only eigenvalue 0 is the zero operator. [3]
Tony template: an operator polynomial gives a projection or a nilpotent operator depending on the characteristic.
Recognition signal: T 2 = cT, with kernel/image/direct sum requested and characteristic treated separately. Standard start: calculate explicit bases for the kernel and image,
then check whether c is invertible; divide by c to get an idempotent when it is invertible, and obtain a nilpotent when c = 0. Reusable structure: an idempotent gives V = im P ⊕ ker P; a nonzero nilpotent
operator cannot be diagonalisable; if N 2 = 0 then (I − N )−1 = I + N. Common lost marks: treating −1 as different from 1 in characteristic 2; asserting equality from
im T ⊆ ker T without comparing dimensions.
1